ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2025
Contrasting Effects of Methyl Jasmonate and Methyl Salicylate on Coffee Plant Defenses against the Southern Red Spider Mite.
Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Herbivory by mites often activates both jasmonate and salicylate signaling pathways in plants. While the role of jasmonic acid (JA) pathway in inducing plant defenses against mites is well established, the contribution of salicylic acid (SA) remains under debate. In previous studies, we found that herbivory by the mite Oligonychus ilicis (McGregor) (Acari: Tetranychidae) triggered the accumulation of both SA and JA, but increased plants susceptibility to subsequent herbivores. Here, we investigated the relative importance of SA and JA signaling pathways in coffee resistance to O. ilicis by applying methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and methyl salicylate (MeSA) as elicitors. To address this question, we combined behavioral assays (host selection and performance) with chemical analyses to attempt to identify and quantify secondary metabolites in plants treated with two concentrations of the elicitors (1.5 mM and 3.0 mM). Treatment with MeSA at 3.0 mM increased mite attraction but did not affect their performance. In contrast, treatment with MeJA at 3.0 mM reduced mite performance without altering mite preference, confirming the defensive role of the JA pathway. Levels of total phenolic compounds were not affected, but target analyses revealed that some phenolics were up-regulated by the elicitor treatments, such as syringic acid and coumaric acids in MeSA-treated plants and o-coumaric acid in MeJA-treated plants. By demonstrating the contrasting effects of MeJA and MeSA on the responses of coffee plants, our study extends the understanding of phytohormone-mediated defenses, providing guidance for sustainable pest management and deepening our comprehension of arthropod-plant interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41348181What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.