Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348052›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025

CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies in the management of multiple myeloma.

Danai Dima, Rahul Banerjee, Doris K Hansen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Danai DimaUniversity of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Rahul BanerjeeUniversity of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Doris K HansenH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of CAR (chimeric antigen receptor) T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies into clinical practice has revolutionized the treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Both modalities have shown impressive clinical efficacy with slightly different but overall manageable toxicity profiles. At present, two B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted CAR T-cell therapies, idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel, are approved for standard use in the United States. There are currently 4 commercially approved bispecific antibodies: teclistamab, elranatamab, and linvoseltamab, which target BCMA, as well as talquetamab, which targets the GPRC5D antigen on the surface of plasma cells. In this review, we explore (a) the advantages and challenges of integrating CAR T-cell therapy earlier in the RRMM treatment course; (b) the safety and efficacy of bispecific antibodies and their evolving role in the current RRMM treatment paradigm; (c) practical considerations for both modalities, focusing on patient selection and supportive care strategies; and (d) recommendations for sequencing of T-cell redirecting therapies to maximize long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMultiple MyelomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenB-Cell Maturation AntigenHumansAntibodies, BispecificB-Cell Maturation AntigenReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID41348052
PMCPMC12891446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.