Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348040›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025

Donor selection, graft engineering, and dosing oh my!

Amy Moskop, Julie-An Talano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amy MoskopDepartment of Pediatrics Hematology Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Julie-An TalanoDepartment of Pediatrics Hematology Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a potentially curative therapy for patients with both malignant and nonmalignant disorders. To select the optimal donor for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, the first step is to search for a matched sibling donor or a matched unrelated donor, both of which yield comparable outcomes in the current clinical landscape. Additional donor options include haploidentical donors, mismatched unrelated donors, and umbilical cord blood donors. Newer transplant approaches have refined the use of these donor sources to improve outcomes. Beyond human leukocyte antigen compatibility, several non-human leukocyte antigen factors influence optimal donor selection. These include donor age, the presence of donor-specific antibodies, cytomegalovirus status, and ABO blood type compatibility. Various graft engineering strategies have been developed. These include posttransplant cyclophosphamide, T-cell depletion techniques such as CD34+ selection, CD45RA depletion, and αβ T-cell depletion, T regulatory purification, and umbilical cord blood expansion. Optimizing the cell dose used in transplantation is also critical to improving outcomes. All of these strategies combined allow nearly every patient to find a donor with continued improvements in outcomes.

Indexed as

Donor SelectionHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationHumansTissue Donors

Identifiers

PMID41348040
PMCPMC12891592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.