Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348036›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025

The role of MRD monitoring and options for CLL management in relapsed/refractory disease.

Brian Sworder, Tanya Siddiqi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian SworderDepartment of Hematology / Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
Tanya SiddiqiDepartment of Hematology / Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of minimal residual disease (MRD) testing is well defined in curable hematological malignancies like acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), which is an incurable low-grade lymphoma, MRD is mostly investigational, especially in the relapsed setting. Newer techniques are trying to get to even deeper levels than before-for instance, 10-6 with sequencing. Here we describe the current techniques of MRD testing in CLL and explore the applications of these modalities in relapsed/refractory CLL in novel targeted therapies, cellular therapy, and other immunotherapies that can lead to deep and durable remissions, especially when used in combinations. More and more prospective interventional trials are now using MRD testing to inform decisions, and the data from these trials will further elucidate the best use of MRD testing in CLL patients. For now, MRD testing is not used for treatment decisions in the real world, although it can be done for monitoring in patients with high-risk genetics.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellNeoplasm, ResidualHumansRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID41348036
PMCPMC12891334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.