Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348030›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025

Deconstructing gene therapy in hemophilia for the clinician.

Guy Young

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Guy YoungChildren's Hospital Los Angeles, Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After decades of research, gene therapy for hemophilia is now commercially available for both hemophilia A and B. Currently, two products, valoctocogene roxaparvovec (for hemophilia A) and etranacogene dezaparvovec (for hemophilia B), have been licensed following approval in the United States and several other countries. Therefore, clinicians must familiarize themselves with these novel treatment options just as they do with other newly available products in order to provide their patients the opportunity to consider which treatment may suit them best. Undoubtedly, gene therapy is a novel platform for treating human disease, and unlike other hemophilia treatments, its biology, mechanisms, and administration logistics are quite complex. Furthermore, additional products using different approaches have entered clinical trials, with more in the preclinical stages of development. This review's aims are (1) to deconstruct gene therapy in hemophilia and provide a basic framework for understanding its components and processes, including the transgene, the vector, and the delivery systems, in order to help clinicians present gene therapy as a treatment option in a shared decision-making model, better understand the clinical data, and explain gene therapy to their patients; (2) to gain knowledge of the currently approved gene therapies for hemophilia A and B, including their eligibility and exclusion criteria and the range of expected outcomes; and (3) to comprehend the shared decision-making process for these therapies and their implementation in clinical practice. In addition, a brief review of the currently approved products and those in clinical trials is presented, followed by a discussion of practical considerations for implementing gene therapy in practice.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyHemophilia AHemophilia BFactor VIIIGenetic VectorsHumansFactor VIII

Identifiers

PMID41348030
PMCPMC12891452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.