ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025
Deconstructing gene therapy in hemophilia for the clinician.
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After decades of research, gene therapy for hemophilia is now commercially available for both hemophilia A and B. Currently, two products, valoctocogene roxaparvovec (for hemophilia A) and etranacogene dezaparvovec (for hemophilia B), have been licensed following approval in the United States and several other countries. Therefore, clinicians must familiarize themselves with these novel treatment options just as they do with other newly available products in order to provide their patients the opportunity to consider which treatment may suit them best. Undoubtedly, gene therapy is a novel platform for treating human disease, and unlike other hemophilia treatments, its biology, mechanisms, and administration logistics are quite complex. Furthermore, additional products using different approaches have entered clinical trials, with more in the preclinical stages of development. This review's aims are (1) to deconstruct gene therapy in hemophilia and provide a basic framework for understanding its components and processes, including the transgene, the vector, and the delivery systems, in order to help clinicians present gene therapy as a treatment option in a shared decision-making model, better understand the clinical data, and explain gene therapy to their patients; (2) to gain knowledge of the currently approved gene therapies for hemophilia A and B, including their eligibility and exclusion criteria and the range of expected outcomes; and (3) to comprehend the shared decision-making process for these therapies and their implementation in clinical practice. In addition, a brief review of the currently approved products and those in clinical trials is presented, followed by a discussion of practical considerations for implementing gene therapy in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.