ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025
What is the best induction for myeloma for the fit patient?
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM), a neoplasm of plasma cells, is the second most common hematologic malignancy. With treatment advances, patients are living longer. However, the disease remains incurable. MM patients are started on a combination of antineoplastic agents with the aim of achieving disease remission. However, at some point patients will experience a relapse requiring another type of therapy. The attrition rate is high, and the periods of remission with each line of therapy become shorter as MM becomes biologically more complex and refractory to treatment. In other words, the initial induction strategy could have a significant impact on the patient's disease trajectory because this will likely be the best and most durable response for the patient. The upfront regimen for a new MM patient is determined based on disease-specific factors such as biology (cytogenetics, circulating plasma cells, extramedullary disease) as well as patient-related factors such as performance status, organ impairment, comorbidities, and fitness status. For patients considered fit, the treatment goal is to achieve maximum therapeutic efficacy to obtain the best disease response. The definition of fitness varies for each trial, and it is a subjective assessment by the provider. It does not necessarily correlate with whether a patient is considered transplant eligible. Patients may choose to defer transplant or may not be offered a transplant based on age cutoff geographically despite being fit. These patients are included in studies for transplant-ineligible patients. In this review, we evaluate the best induction regimen for MM patients fit for treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.