ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025
Using genomics to refine pediatric AML risk stratification.
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the past 20 years, advances in genomic technologies have greatly improved our understanding of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Today, cytogenetic tests can detect structural changes in approximately 75% of cases and remain a main tool for assessing risk. Recent technologies, such as next-generation sequencing, are revealing additional structural alterations (cryptic fusions) and mutations that often cooperate to influence disease biology and treatment response. This evolving genetic landscape has identified unique childhood subtypes of AML defined by specific fusions, such as NUP98::NSD1, CBFA2T3::GLIS2, and varied KMT2A rearrangements, which are linked to distinct clinical outcomes. Emerging data also point to the poor prognosis associated with certain subtypes of NPM1, like the NPM1-D isoform. Additionally, mutations in genes like WT1, DNMT3A, and TP53, the latter of which are rare in childhood AML, may influence patients' outcomes, particularly when occurring in combination. Targeted therapies, including FLT3, BCL2, and menin inhibitors, are beginning to reshape treatment, offering more personalized approaches. However, integrating these drugs effectively into the patient's treatment strategy remains challenging due to the genetic complexity and rarity of pediatric AML. Key issues ahead include identifying which genetic features truly affect outcomes, using this information to personalize therapy, predicting who will benefit from targeted drugs, and choosing the best markers to track disease response over time. Looking forward, collaborative efforts are urgently needed to validate pediatric-specific biomarkers, test novel drug combinations, and link genetic data to clinical outcomes to design trials and future treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.