Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348019›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025

Choosing the optimal maintenance strategy in multiple myeloma.

Benjamin Puliafito, Diana Cirstea, Noopur Raje

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient preferences for treatment‑free intervals in multiple myeloma: mixed‑methods insights on monitoring trade‑offs and supportive care improvements.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin PuliafitoCenter for Multiple Myeloma, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Diana CirsteaCenter for Multiple Myeloma, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Noopur RajeCenter for Multiple Myeloma, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While lenalidomide has been the established standard of care for maintenance after autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, risk-adapted maintenance strategies with the addition of proteasome inhibitors can provide additional benefit in high-risk disease. The widespread use of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in induction and consolidation has further disrupted this paradigm, offering the use of anti-CD38 mAbs in maintenance. Novel immunotherapeutic approaches and minimal residual disease-guided maintenance strategies are being actively investigated. The evolution of maintenance strategies provides a window to a future where maintenance therapy is not only more effective at sustaining deep and durable responses but also more dynamic with careful de-escalation strategies.

Indexed as

Maintenance ChemotherapyMultiple MyelomaAntibodies, MonoclonalHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLenalidomideNeoplasm, ResidualProteasome InhibitorsTransplantation, AutologousAntibodies, MonoclonalLenalidomideProteasome Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID41348019
PMCPMC12891353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.