ArticleHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025
Optimizing the "right" patient selection for treatment for sickle cell disease.
Article in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD), the most prevalent hemoglobinopathy globally, is a complex, systemic disorder with significant phenotypic variability and evolving clinical burden. As the therapeutic landscape expands-ranging from hydroxyurea and red blood cell transfusions to novel disease-modifying agents and curative approaches, such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and gene therapy-patient selection for each strategy becomes increasingly multifaceted. This article explores how clinical severity, genotype, age, organ involvement, access to care, and patient preferences interact in shaping therapeutic decisions. Two illustrative cases highlight how disease trajectory, individual choices, and real-world barriers influence eligibility and response to treatment. We propose a multidimensional framework for patient selection, incorporating both clinical indicators and patient-centered outcomes. While monotherapy with a single disease-modifying therapy remains the cornerstone of SCD treatment, all therapeutic decisions should be individualized. However, combination and curative approaches are more complex and require a comprehensive evaluation of efficacy, feasibility, and patient values. Emerging trends, including biomarker-driven stratification, inclusive clinical trials, and shared decision-making tools, coupled with the use of artificial intelligence, offer opportunities to better align therapy with the needs of diverse patients across settings. Ultimately, defining the "right" patient demands dynamic, context-sensitive evaluation, ensuring that therapeutic advances translate into equitable and valuable care for individuals with SCD globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.