ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025
Demystifying the diagnosis and management of ICUS, CHIP, and CCUS.
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical management of clonal hematopoiesis.Cancer · 2026Review
- Exercises in Clinical Reasoning: Applying High-Value Care When the Counts Don't Add Up.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Hematopoietic mosaic chromosomal alterations are pleiotropic drivers of inflammaging, multimorbidity, and mortality.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Sepsis risk associated with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP): a secondary analysis of the ASPREE trial.Leukemia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precursor states such as clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) and clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance, carry distinct risks for progression to myeloid neoplasms and age-related comorbidities. While biologically distinct, idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance is also a differential diagnostic consideration for these precursor lesions. Through 3 illustrative cases, we highlight the diagnostic complexity and clinical relevance of these entities, emphasizing the need for integrated clinical, morphologic, and molecular assessment to guide individualized patient care. Emerging evidence suggests that CHIP contributes not only to hematopoietic stem cell aberrations and potential myeloid neoplasia but also to cardiovascular disease and solid-tumor outcomes, reinforcing its significance as a systemic biomarker. We summarize the current risk stratification tools and ongoing clinical trials aimed at modulating inflammation and clonal dynamics in CH-associated conditions. We also outline our approach from our Clonal Hematopoiesis Clinic, which incorporates surveillance, preventive care, and clinical trial enrollment. Establishing standardized diagnostic criteria, harmonizing trial frameworks, and formally incorporating CHIP into hematology, oncology, cardiology, and survivorship paradigms will be essential to reducing long-term morbidity and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.