Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348014›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025

Future directions in transplantation for aplastic anemia.

Akshay Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Akshay SharmaDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.

Funding

Novel therapeutic gene editing to induce fetal hemoglobin for sickle cell diseaseU01HL163983 · NHLBI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI Akshay Sharma, Shengdar Tsai · 2023 to 2026
$4.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL163983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment algorithms for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) are evolving. A hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) from a matched sibling donor is preferred for younger patients with SAA, whereas immunosuppressive treatment (IST) has traditionally been recommended for older patients. Because of the toxicity and risk associated with HCTs from alternative donors (ie, matched unrelated donors, haploidentical donors, or umbilical cord blood units), this approach has generally been reserved for patients who have experienced relapse after IST or have proved refractory to it. However, the recent development of reduced-toxicity conditioning regimens and the use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide as prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease have significantly reduced the risk of morbidity and mortality after HCT. These changes have also expanded the pool of donors such that alternative donors are now increasingly being used for HCTs for patients with SAA. With the use of these novel HCT regimens and improved supportive care practices, overall survival and disease-free survival after HCT have improved over the last few decades, and disease-free survival after HCT may now be superior to that after IST. Several ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the use of matched unrelated donors and have expanded the use of haploidentical donors in the up-front setting for treatment-naive patients, thereby challenging the equipoise that has existed in this field for decades. These advances may usher in a paradigm shift in the management of SAA in the coming years.

Indexed as

Anemia, AplasticHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationDisease-Free SurvivalGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsTransplantation ConditioningImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID41348014
PMCPMC12891447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.