ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025
Where do immunotherapies stand in management of acute leukemia in adults?
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunotherapies have significantly transformed the treatment landscape of acute leukemia in adults, most notably in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin have become established treatments, enhancing remission rates, measurable residual disease clearance, and overall survival in relapsed/refractory disease, and these agents, are now increasingly incorporated into frontline therapy. Additionally, autologous CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has dramatically improved salvage treatment outcomes, demonstrating exceptional remission rates and durable responses even in heavily pretreated patients. Enhanced understanding of mechanisms underlying disease resistance and relapse is guiding the development of optimized combination and sequential therapeutic approaches. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), gemtuzumab ozogamicin has shown significant clinical benefits, particularly in molecularly defined subsets. Ongoing research focuses on novel antibody-drug conjugates, immune cell engagers, and advanced cellular therapies, facing challenges primarily in selecting appropriate targets and overcoming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. For T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), therapeutic innovation is confronted with unique challenges due to overlapping antigen expression between malignant, normal, and CAR T-cells. Promising early clinical and preclinical studies are currently evaluating anti-CD38 antibodies and CAR T-cells mostly directed against CD5 and CD7. This review highlights how immunotherapy has reshaped treatment paradigms across acute leukemias, underscoring successful experiences in B-ALL. These insights emphasize the need for continued innovation to overcome existing hurdles in AML and T-ALL, ultimately aiming to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.