Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348005›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025

Post-HCT maintenance therapy for AML: who, when, why, how long?

Mark Levis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mark LevisSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) as it represents a highly effective treatment to prevent relapse of their disease. While HCT is an important part of curative therapy for many AML patients, post-HCT relapse still occurs, and so post-HCT maintenance therapy is offered to some patients-often without any reliable evidence supporting its use. More and more molecularly targeted drugs are emerging in the field, and while there is randomized data supporting the use of FLT3 inhibitors in this setting, no other drug class has been convincingly shown to benefit these patients (yet). In acknowledgment of the fact that clinicians will continue to offer post-HCT maintenance in the hope of improving outcomes, this review focuses on the data (or lack thereof) directly supporting this practice, as well as some of the pitfalls that can be encountered with these drugs when used as maintenance.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaintenance Chemotherapyfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3HumansFLT3 protein, humanfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3

Identifiers

PMID41348005
PMCPMC12891524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.