ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025
High-grade B-cell lymphomas: high difficulties to diagnose and treat?
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The high-grade B-cell lymphomas represent a pathologically and clinically heterogeneous group of mature B-cell malignancies. With modern molecular diagnostics and genomic studies, they are becoming increasingly resolved as we understand more of their shared oncogenic mechanisms. The result has been a realignment of the classification of these tumors, which may initially appear baffling. These tumors are most commonly of large cell morphology but can be of variable high-grade morphology. The double-hit high-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBLs) that harbor dual translocations of MYC and BCL2 are of a germinal center phenotype and have a homogeneous biology. By contrast, those with dual MYC and BCL6 translocations do not appear to have such a unifying biology. The group of HGBLs not otherwise specified is poorly resolved and not characterized by distinct oncogenic aberrations. Together, the HGBLs may present with aggressive features; respond poorly to R-CHOP, ie, rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; and may benefit from intensified induction regimens. However, clinical interpretation is hampered by a paucity of prospective studies. In the relapsed and refractory setting, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has demonstrated significant efficacy, and there is much expectation for other novel therapeutic approaches, including bispecific antibodies. By understanding the biology and a commitment to collaborative prospective evaluation, their high diagnostic and treatment challenges may be resolved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.