ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025
Gene transfer and genome editing of T cells for cancer immunotherapy: from allogeneic HSCT to TCR gene editing.
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CRISPR/Cas9 in cancer therapy: clinical translation, mechanistic strategies, and therapeutic directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adoptive T-cell therapy has emerged as a transformative modality in cancer immunotherapy, building upon foundational principles established in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In this setting, while donor T cells mediate curative graft-versus-leukemia and graft-versus-infection effects, their alloreactivity poses significant risks. Gene transfer strategies-such as suicide gene insertion-have enabled the safer use of donor lymphocytes by allowing the selective elimination of T cells in case of adverse events. With this initial gene therapy approach, several lessons on the function, persistence, safety, and efficacy of engineered T cells were learned. More recently, advances in genome editing technologies have enabled precise manipulation of T-cell genomes and function, including disruption of endogenous T-cell receptors (TCRs) and insertion of tumor-specific receptors, such as chimeric antigen receptors and tumor-specific TCRs. Integration of T-cell manufacturing protocols optimized for persistence and resistance to immune suppression-largely facilitated by the possibility to simultaneously edit multiple genes (multiplex genome editing) in the same cells-has positioned engineered T cells as programmable and persistent therapeutics. Here, we briefly review key milestones, challenges, and innovations in T-cell gene engineering, from allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to next-generation TCR-edited immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.