ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025
Have CARs stalled for non-B-cell malignancies? Where are we, and where are we going?
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of B-cell malignancies, but similar success in T-cell and myeloid leukemias has remained elusive due to unique biological and logistical barriers. T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia poses challenges such as fratricide, product contamination, and profound immunosuppression from T-cell aplasia. Gene editing, protein expression blockers, and antigen selection strategies have been employed to mitigate these risks, while allogeneic CAR T-cell platforms offer rapid deployment but carry risks of graft-versus-host disease and immune rejection. Early-phase trials targeting CD5 and CD7 have demonstrated promising response rates, particularly with gene-edited or bicistronic constructs, although toxicities and the need for consolidative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remain significant hurdles. Similarly, CAR T-cell therapy for acute myeloid leukemia faces the dual obstacles of antigen nonspecificity and a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Multiantigen targeting, logic-gated designs, and epitope editing have emerged to improve specificity and safety. Novel approaches to overcome the immunosuppressive milieu include checkpoint blockade and cytokine pathway modulation. Allogeneic and "off-the-shelf" CAR T-cell products are being developed to address manufacturing challenges in patients with rapidly progressive disease. Collectively, these advances highlight the potential of cellular therapies in high-risk leukemias and underscore the importance of continued innovation to improve outcomes in these historically treatment-refractory populations. Using a real-world case, we highlight the major challenges and innovative strategies shaping CAR T-cell therapy for T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.