Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41347977›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025

Immune targeting in Ph-negative and Ph-positive B-ALL: improving outcomes and minimizing chemotherapy in adult B-ALL.

Kristen M O'Dwyer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kristen M O'DwyerDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the addition of antibody-based immunotherapy to frontline treatment regimens for B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), patients across the age spectrum now experience superior long-term survival. The pressing question for the field is whether immunotherapy may replace some of the intensive elements of the standard chemotherapy backbone to reduce overall toxicity and duration while maintaining superior outcomes. For young adults with B-ALL, most clinical trials have added immunotherapy to the intensive, pediatric-inspired regimens to achieve deeper remissions, while necessarily increasing duration, complexity, and possible toxicities. In contrast, clinical trials for older adults have used immunotherapy as a substitute to eliminate or reduce cytotoxic chemotherapy. And although survival outcomes for older adults remain distinctly inferior to those in the pediatric age group, it is hoped that the potential simplification of the chemoimmunotherapy backbone for all patients may be guided by the successes and shortcomings discovered in the treatment of older adults. In this article, I discuss the treatment of older adult patients with B-ALL in the immunotherapy era and how this approach may pave the way for implementing a deescalation strategy for younger adult patients with B-ALL, while maintaining the significant survival benefits that have been achieved during the past 20 years.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyPhiladelphia ChromosomePrecursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41347977
PMCPMC12891415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.