Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41347975›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025

Posttransplant cells for the win? DLI and adoptive cell therapy to eradicate MRD.

Pleun Schonewille, Anna van Rhenen, Renske Mt Ten Ham, Moniek de Witte, Jürgen Kuball

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pleun SchonewilleDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anna van RhenenDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Renske Mt Ten HamDepartment of Epidemiology & Health Economics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Moniek de WitteDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jürgen KuballDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relapse remains the leading cause of failure after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) for hematologic malignancies. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), the infusion of lymphocytes from the original stem cell donor, was introduced in the late 1980s as a strategy to prevent or treat relapse by augmenting the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect. Over time, DLI has been used in various settings: initially as therapeutic DLI for overt relapse and later as preemptive DLI, administered in response to early signs of relapse, such as persistent or recurrent measurable residual disease (MRD), or as prophylactic DLI to mitigate high relapse risk before clinical relapse occurs (see Visual Abstract). However, questions remain regarding how, when, and in whom DLI is best deployed, reflecting ongoing controversy and heterogeneity in clinical practice. A recent survey of 165 European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centers across 43 countries reported that DLI was used prophylactically for high-risk hematologic diseases in 43.8% of these centers. DLI was used preemptively for MRD positivity in 86.9% of centers and for mixed chimerism in 73.1%. Therapeutic DLI was administered for hematologic relapse in 73.1% of centers. Active graft-versus-host disease and active infections were considered absolute contraindications by 85.6% and 57.5% of the centers, respectively. This observed variability in center practices underscores the need to clarify the "who, when, and why" of posttransplant cellular interventions. In this review, we explore DLI strategies and the potential sequencing with novel targeted therapies across prophylactic, preemptive, and therapeutic applications, illustrated through case examples in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. We highlight findings from retrospective, as well as the scarce prospective studies and extend considerations to other indications, including chronic myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Additionally, we review emerging combination strategies with targeted therapies across different hematologic malignancies and adoptive cell therapies beyond conventional DLI.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationImmunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphocyte TransfusionNeoplasm, ResidualGraft vs Leukemia EffectHumans

Identifiers

PMID41347975
PMCPMC12891373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.