ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025
A practical approach to immune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy.
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maternal Bleeding Outcomes in Pregnant Women With Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): A National Database Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy: Clinical Challenges, Maternal-Fetal Risks, and Management Strategies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) often presents for the first time in pregnancy, or, in patients with a history of ITP, pregnancy can trigger a relapse. ITP in pregnancy is often mild, leading to minimal or no symptoms; however, treatment may be needed if thrombocytopenia becomes severe, if bleeding occurs, or in anticipation of delivery and neuraxial analgesia. To facilitate the diagnosis of ITP in pregnancy, we present a systematic approach that allows clinicians to first consider urgent pregnancy-related thrombocytopenic conditions such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy or thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; exclude other causes of thrombocytopenia; and determine the need for treatment. We review options for first-line therapies for ITP in pregnancy, including corticosteroids (prednisone or methylprednisolone) and intravenous immune globulin, which has a favorable safety profile in pregnancy, and second-line therapy options that have been used in pregnancy including thrombopoietin receptor agonists, rituximab, and certain immunosuppressant medications such as azathioprine. We summarize the recommendations for platelet targets for delivery, recognizing that the evidence is limited, including a platelet count of 50 × 109/L or higher for caesarean delivery and 70 × 109/L or higher for neuraxial anesthesia. Treatment decisions for ITP in pregnancy should be informed by patients' values and preferences along with a multidisciplinary team that includes hematologists, obstetricians, and anesthesiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.