ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Spatiotemporal Characteristics of the Stereoscopic Anisotropy.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: There is a well-known orientation anisotropy in stereovision, where disparity thresholds for sinusoidal corrugations of low spatial frequencies are much higher for vertical than for horizontal orientations. While previous research has indicated that the visual system responds more rapidly to horizontal than vertical slanted surfaces, the spatiotemporal characteristics underlying the stereoscopic anisotropy have not been thoroughly studied. This study aims to quantify the anisotropy across a range of spatial and temporal frequencies. Methods: We measured disparity thresholds for vertical and horizontal sinusoidal corrugations across different spatial (from 0.05 to 0.8 cpd) and temporal frequencies (from 0 to 8 Hz). To interpret the data, we fitted a spatiotemporal cross-correlation model (that approximates the disparity-energy calculation in V1). The model included a shift parameter to capture the differences in sensitivity between orientations. Results: Disparity thresholds as a function of temporal frequency revealed a low-pass shape. Across all conditions, thresholds were consistently higher for vertical than for horizontal corrugations. The degree of anisotropy decreased with increasing spatial frequency and was strongest at lower spatial frequencies. Model fits revealed similar spatial and temporal weighting functions for both orientations, with a global vertical shift accounting for the reduced sensitivity observed for vertical corrugations. Conclusions: This study provides a systematic characterization of the spatiotemporal properties of stereoscopic anisotropy. Disparity thresholds were consistently higher for vertical than for horizontal corrugations, particularly at low spatial frequencies and for all temporal frequencies. Our simulation results indicate that the anisotropy can be captured by a global vertical shift in sensitivity, while the spatiotemporal disparity processing is similar for both orientations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.