Trial reportBlood2026
Early time to relapse as a survival prognosticator in nodal mature T-cell lymphomas: results from the PETAL consortium.
Trial report in Blood, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractWe assessed the overall survival (OS) impact of time to relapse (TTR) in multinational cohorts with independent observational and randomized validation. Patients with nMTCL with frontline complete response were assigned to TTR12 (≤12 months) or without TTR12 based on time to progression or next therapy. OS analyses included modified landmark (m-LM), standard landmark (s-LM), and time-dependent Cox (td-Cox), adjusting for age, histology, and prognostic index for T-cell lymphoma (PIT) score. Across 452 patients, 165 (36.5%) had TTR12, 181 (40%) relapsed at ≥12 months, and 106 (23.5%) remained relapse-free. TTR12 conferred worse OS using m-LM (hazard ratio [HR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-2.90; P< .001), s-LM (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.39-2.66; P< .001); and td-Cox (HR, 5.81; 95% CI, 2.94-11.46; P< .001). Results were consistent in the independent validation cohorts. TTR12 consistently conferred worse OS irrespective of frontline stem cell transplantation or PIT score, in peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (m-LM: HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.51-3.55; P< .001; s-LM: HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.33-3.31; P = .001), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (m-LM: HR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.18-9.50; P = .023; s-LM: HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.02-8.81; P = .046), and angioimmunoblastic T-cell/T follicular helper cell lymphoma (m-LM only: HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.15-3.21; P = .013). Second-line novel therapies improved OS (second-line start to death) vs chemotherapy in TTR12 only (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.97; P = .038; without TTR12: HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.51-1.32; P = .407). TTR12 serves as a prognostic and potential OS surrogate marker, supporting stratification of new risk groups and need for their differential treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.