Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41347758›Full record

ReviewPacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE2026

Overcoming the Challenges of Transmural Durable Lesions With PFA-Impact of Electrode Design and Contact Assessment.

Lea Melki, Saar Moisa, Dan Reinders, Samantha Boucher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lea MelkiKardium Inc., Burnaby, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7738-4696
Saar MoisaKardium Inc., Burnaby, Canada.
Dan ReindersKardium Inc., Burnaby, Canada.
Samantha BoucherKardium Inc., Burnaby, Canada.

Funding

Kardium Inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrode design and reliable contact assessment are critical for creating durable pulsed field ablation (PFA) lesions to treat atrial fibrillation while minimizing collateral damage. This review introduces a novel "map-and-ablate" PFA catheter featuring flat electrodes, thermal contact assessment, and fully customizable electrode selection. We explore how electrode design impacts energy delivery and electric field direction, the importance of reliable contact assessment in ensuring lesion durability, and how customized electrode selection may minimize collateral damage.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationElectrodesEquipment DesignHumansatrial fibrillationpulmonary vein isolationpulsed field ablation

Identifiers

PMID41347758
PMCPMC12813647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.