ArticleJournal of fish biology2026
Deciphering the complex life cycle and partial migration of an ecological engineer and critical Neotropical fishery species, Prochilodus costatus.
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding complex migration patterns, including drivers of partial migration and habitat use, is challenging but essential for conservation, as it determines a species' adaptative capacity in the face of environmental change and anthropogenic threats. Therefore, we investigated the traits of partial migration and spawning use in the long-distance migratory and ecosystem engineering fish Prochilodus costatus (pioa). Data from 200 adult individuals tagged with radio transmitters at their feeding and spawning sites, combined with egg and larvae sampling identified through metabarcoding, revealed strong fidelity to both feeding and spawning sites. Providing a comprehensive overview of the pioa life cycle, this study shows that only fish present at specific upstream sites reproduce, indicating that populations isolated downstream, or whose migrations are blocked for any reason, fail to reproduce. Adults may also remain resident at spawning grounds, but these residents are smaller and have lower body condition, suggesting suboptimal feeding conditions at these sites. Use of spawning grounds was not evenly distributed: approximately half of the tagged fish performed annual upstream reproductive migrations, with 58.6% migrating to Bambuí River and 41.49% to the upper Sao Francisco River basin spawning sites, displaying homing behaviour. Hormone levels, body weight, and condition factor were not related to migration decisions, suggesting that the drivers of partial migration remain unclear. Our findings reveal putative population structuring, site fidelity, habitat use, and partial migratory behaviours shared with other phylogenetically distant fish groups, indicating that these results may be generalizable to other Neotropical migratory species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.