Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41347694›Full record

ArticlePM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2026

The use of practice analysis to develop a content outline for a board certifying examination.

Vu Q C Nguyen, Carolyn Geis, Mikaela M Raddatz, Kevin Krafft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vu Q C NguyenDepartment of PM&R, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7392-1713
Carolyn GeisAmerican Board of PM&R (ABPMR), Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Mikaela M RaddatzAmerican Board of PM&R (ABPMR), Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Kevin KrafftAmerican Board of PM&R (ABPMR), Rochester, Minnesota, United States.

Funding

American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the first physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) board certification in 1947, PM&R's board-certifying Part I Examinations have been created by volunteer subject matter experts (SME) in private and academic practices. The American Board of PM&R (ABPMR) relies on the SMEs to create the exam's content outline that is then used as the framework to craft questions for the exam. Although this is a rigorous process with representative specialties across the entire spectrum of PM&R, it relies on the opinions and experiences of these SMEs. Because PM&R has grown in many clinical directions, in 2023, the ABPMR determined that the content outline should more appropriately reflect an updated scope of practice for the specialty. To achieve this goal, ABPMR contracted a psychometric consulting company, with experience in high-stakes professional credentialing, to complete a practice analysis for PM&R.

objectiveTo develop an updated content outline for the PM&R Part I certifying exam that embodied the breadth of the specialty including the knowledge and skills required of a competent PM&R physician upon completion of residency training.

designPursuant to this goal, the rigorous research methodology called practice analysis was employed. This article describes the process of practice analysis including project planning; use of focus groups; survey development, dissemination, and analysis; and decision making to determine content and domain weighting for the ABPMR Part I Examination. This information was used by SMEs to assemble a revised content outline to be used for future board Part I Examinations in PM&R.

conclusionFor the first time since its inception, the content outline of the ABPMR Part I Examination was successfully updated using a practice analysis method. This report described the process to achieve this goal.

Indexed as

CertificationClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementPhysical and Rehabilitation MedicineSpecialty BoardsHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41347694
PMCPMC13358402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.