ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026
Model-Based Meta-Analysis With MonolixSuite: A Tutorial for Longitudinal Categorical and Continuous Data.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current State-of-the-Art and Future Advancements of Model-Based Meta-Analysis.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- When Survival Improves But Quality of Life Does Not: A Model-Based Meta-Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Systematic Review and Model-Based Meta-Analysis of Targeted Drugs for Systemic Sclerosis.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Model-Based Meta-Analysis With MonolixSuite: A Tutorial for Longitudinal Categorical and Continuous Data.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) informs key drug development decisions by integrating data, published or unpublished, from multiple studies. Due to these various sources of information and the use of summary-level data (e.g., mean responses over treatment arms or percent responders), MBMA models require careful implementation. This tutorial provides a comprehensive guide for conducting an MBMA with MonolixSuite, focusing on longitudinal continuous and categorical data. Two case studies are presented: the first examining naproxen in osteoarthritis and the second evaluating canakinumab compared to existing treatments in rheumatoid arthritis. The tutorial explains the process of model building and handling study heterogeneity in Monolix, including how to include between-study variability and between-treatment-arm variability. It also shows how to apply appropriate weighting due to the use of summary-level data. For model evaluation, the tutorial demonstrates the use of automatically generated diagnostic plots, statistical tests, and convergence assessment tools. Furthermore, it illustrates how to use the model in Simulx to support the decision-making process, such as by simulating clinical trials. This step-by-step guidance offers practical insights for leveraging MBMA in model-informed drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.