SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2025
Acupuncture for insomnia in people with cancer.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics and influencing factors of sleep disturbance in breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Non-invasive neuroregulation techniques applied to patients with consciousness disorders: a narrative review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleInsomnia is a common issue affecting people with cancer. Although acupuncture is widely used as a treatment option for insomnia, its effects on cancer patients require a rigorous and up-to-date evaluation.
objectivesTo evaluate the benefits and harms of acupuncture for insomnia in people with cancer. SEARCH
methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and five other databases or trial registries in January 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a minimum duration of four weeks that evaluated acupuncture (defined as needle insertion at specific acupoints) for treating insomnia in patients with cancer. OUTCOMES: Our outcomes were insomnia severity measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), sleep quality measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), adverse events, and sleep diary outcomes including sleep onset latency (SOL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), total sleep time (TST), and sleep efficiency (SE). RISK OF BIAS: We assessed the risk of bias using the RoB 2 tool. SYNTHESIS
methodsWe performed random-effects meta-analysis to calculate risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the certainty of evidence with GRADE and interpreted findings for continuous outcomes against minimally important differences (MIDs). INCLUDED STUDIES: We included five studies with 402 participants. The participants were predominantly females with breast cancer, and most were people following primary cancer treatment. SYNTHESIS OF
resultsWe identified three comparisons with outcomes assessed at the end of the interventions. We rated the certainty of the evidence as very low-to-moderate, mainly due to risk of bias and the imprecision of effect estimates from the small studies. Acupuncture versus sham acupuncture We are very uncertain about all results due to very low-certainty evidence. Compared to sham acupuncture, acupuncture may have little to no effect on post-intervention ISI scores (MD -3.17, 95% CI -10.39 to 4.05; MID -4.7 points; 2 studies, 152 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and PSQI scores (MD -1.16, 95% CI -3.53 to 1.22; MID -3 points; 2 studies, 152 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Acupuncture may increase the risk of adverse events (RR 2.60, 95% CI 0.98 to 6.90; 1 study, 138 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but this result is very uncertain. Regarding sleep diary outcomes, acupuncture compared with sham acupuncture may improve post-intervention SOL (MD -10.02 min, 95% CI -19.09 to -0.94; MID 20 minutes; 2 studies, 152 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and SE (MD 4.90%, 95% CI 1.98 to 7.82; MID 10%; 2 studies, 152 participants; very low-certainty evidence) very slightly. It may have a large effect on TST (MD 45.94 min, 95% CI -0.93 to 92.80; MID 15 minutes; 2 studies; 152 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but this result is very uncertain. Data on WASO were unavailable. No outcome both exceeded its MID and was statistically significant. Acupuncture versus inactive control We are very uncertain about all results due to very low-certainty evidence. Compared to an inactive control, acupuncture may reduce post-intervention ISI scores (MD -3.88, 95% CI -7.25 to -0.52; MID -4.7 points; 2 studies, 46 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and PSQI scores (-2.20, 95% CI -3.35 to -1.04; MID -3 points; 3 studies, 98 participants; very low-certainty evidence) slightly, but may increase the risk of adverse events (RR 15.49, 95% CI 2.12 to 113.10; 2 studies, 76 participants; very low-certainty evidence). With respect to sleep diary outcomes, acupuncture may slightly improve post-intervention SOL (MD -15.61 min, 95% CI -29.23 to -1.99; MID 20 minutes; 2 studies, 46 participants; very low-certainty evidence), TST (MD 34.61 min, 95% CI 12.54 to 56.69; MID 15 minutes; 2 studies, 46 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and SE slightly (MD 5.65, 95% CI 0.99 to 10.32; MID 10%; 2 studies, 46 participants; very low-certainty evidence). However, it may result in little to no difference in post-intervention WASO (MD 5.70 min, 95% CI -17.25 to 28.65; 1 study, 30 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Only the TST improvement surpassed the MID. Acupuncture versus cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) Compared to CBT-I, acupuncture probably results in slightly higher (worse) post-intervention ISI scores (MD 2.60, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.07; 1 study, 160 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and PSQI scores (MD 1.51, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.51; 1 study, 160 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). However, it may have little to no effect on adverse events (RR 1.68, 95% CI 0.59 to 4.79; 1 study; 160 participants; low-certainty evidence). Regarding sleep diary outcomes, acupuncture compared with CBT-I probably slightly worsens post-intervention SOL (MD 16.33 min, 95% CI 8.22 to 24.44; MID 10 minutes; 1 study, 160 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and SE (MD -5.00%, 95% CI -8.48 to -1.52; MID 5%; 1 study, 160 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) but probably increases TST (MD 26.80 min, 95% CI 3.87 to 49.73; MID 15 minutes; 1 study, 160 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). It probably has little to no effect on WASO (MD 8.94 min, 95% CI -1.47 to 19.35; MID 15 minutes; 1 study, 160 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The effects on SOL, TST, and SE reached the MIDs. AUTHORS'
conclusionsBased on very low-certainty evidence, acupuncture may have little to no effect on insomnia severity or sleep quality compared to sham acupuncture, though it may offer slight improvements in some sleep diary metrics. In contrast, when compared to an inactive control, acupuncture may alleviate insomnia severity and improve sleep quality and most sleep diary metrics, but adverse events should be taken into consideration. These findings are derived primarily from studies of female adults with breast cancer. Based on low- to moderate-certainty evidence, when compared with CBT-I, acupuncture is likely less effective at reducing insomnia severity, improving sleep quality, SOL and SE. Conversely, acupuncture probably improves TST. Larger, methodologically robust, long-term trials that include diverse cancer populations are required to provide definitive conclusions.
fundingThis work was funded by the Postdoctor Research Fund of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (2025HXBH063) and the Fundamental Research Fund of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (No. ZZ17-XRZ-113). REGISTRATION: Protocol available via doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015177.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.