ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2025
Recovery from chronic fatigue syndrome: a reflexive thematic analysis of experiences of people before, during and after treatment.
Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Persistent physical symptoms not explained by structural abnormalities or disease processes: a primary care approach to promote recovery.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Review
- Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome diagnostic reporting in the 2021-2023 National Health Interview Survey.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a chronic illness marked by severe, medically unexplained fatigue. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) moderately improves fatigue and functioning. However, there is debate about recovery and how this should be operationalised. The impact of treatment on how recovery is viewed is also unclear. This study explored how people with CFS receiving CBT viewed recovery and whether these views differed at various stages of treatment.
methodsA total of 19 people with CFS receiving CBT were recruited from a specialist service in the UK. Purposive sampling was used to ensure a mix of age, gender, ethnicity and treatment stage. Semi-structured interviews were used to gather data and a reflexive thematic analysis was conducted.
resultsThe sample included 11 (57.9%) females and 8 (42.1%) males, with a mean age of 40 years old (range: 20-63) The mean duration of illness prior to treatment was 60 months (range: 12-142). The following four themes were identified in relation to recovery: (1) a personal process; (2) a reduction in symptoms; (3) a process of rebuilding, regaining, and retaining; (4) disrupting old ways of living. Theme Four was expressed mostly by those at later-treatment stages, suggesting that these emerged during treatment. DISCUSSION: Recovery is a blend of 'clinical recovery', 'personal recovery' and 'illness management' models applied to other chronic conditions. Data suggests that concepts can change, and treatment may result in patients adopting views more in line with 'personal recovery' and 'illness management' models. These more flexible definitions, particularly those comprising changes to pre-illness beliefs and behaviours, new roles, acceptance and strategies to manage symptoms, corresponded with greater hope. Findings may help to inform realistic treatment expectations and contribute to more meaningful outcome measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.