ArticlePublic health nutrition2025
Policy gap: most child-appealing packaged food products in Canada will display a 'high in' front-of-package nutrition symbol.
Article in Public health nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCanadian front-of-package (FOP) labelling regulations aim to improve dietary patterns by identifying foods high in sodium, sugars and/or saturated fat with a 'high in' FOP nutrition symbol. However, child-appealing marketing on product packaging may undermine these efforts. Therefore, this study (1) compared the prevalence of FOP symbols between products with child-appealing and non-child appealing packaging in the Canadian food supply and (2) identified the number and types of FOP symbols on products with child-appealing packaging (CAP).
designUsing the University of Toronto's Food Label Information and Price 2017 database, 5850 packaged foods were analysed, 746 of which had CAP. Products were assessed against FOP labelling regulations.
settingLarge grocery retailers by market share in Canada.
participantsFoods and beverages available in 2017. Results: 74·4 % of products with CAP would require a 'high in' FOP symbol, significantly higher than the 65·7 % of products with non-CAP. Notably, 54·4 % of products with CAP exceeded FOP labelling thresholds for sugars compared with 37·8 % of products with non-CAP.
conclusionsFindings highlight a policy gap in Canadian nutrition regulations, as CAP remains a major source of marketing of unhealthy foods to children, undermining the impact of FOP labelling. To address this, food packaging should be included in Canada's marketing restrictions, and products displaying a 'high in' FOP symbol should be automatically restricted from marketing to children. This study underscores the urgent need to harmonise Canadian nutrition regulations to synergistically promote healthier food choices among children and improve their health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.