SynthesisThe Journal of laryngology and otology2026
A systematic mapping review of qualitative research in paediatric otolaryngology.
Synthesis in The Journal of laryngology and otology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo map the scope, methods and focus areas of qualitative research in paediatric otolaryngology.
methodsA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic mapping review searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and PsycInfo (August 2025) for qualitative or mixed-methods studies with a qualitative component related to paediatric otolaryngology. Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria. Key study characteristics were extracted; no formal risk-of-bias assessment was performed, in line with the aims of a mapping review.
resultsEighty-nine studies were included. Publications rose sharply after 2015, with nearly three-quarters from the USA, Canada and the UK. Otology (49 per cent) and laryngology (40 per cent) predominated; common topics were hearing loss, tonsillectomy and tracheostomy. Interviews, mainly semi-structured (73 per cent), were the dominant method, and caregivers were the most frequent participants (62 per cent).
conclusionsQualitative research in paediatric otolaryngology is growing but remains geographically and methodologically narrow. Broader stakeholder inclusion and methodological diversity are needed to deepen understanding and support patient-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.