ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026
Earlier de-isolation of SARS-CoV-2-infected ICU patients using a novel viability PCR: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Differentiation of Intact West Nile Virus Using a PMAxx™-Enabled Digital PCR Workflow.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19 are isolated until two subsequent SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests have become negative. The question is whether the viral RNA detected here represents intact or compromised viral particles. A viability PCR method detects only intact infectious viruses and disregards RNA from incomplete non-infectious viruses or RNA remnants. We hypothesize that the time to a negative PCR is shorter using the viability PCR compared to conventional SARS-CoV-2 PCR. Patients admitted to the ICU in the Maastricht University Medical Center within an ongoing prospective cohort were included, and respiratory samples were collected three times weekly. Samples were aliquoted for viability PCR into two aliquots, one of which was treated with propidium monoazide (PMA) to eliminate incomplete viruses. The PMA-untreated sample corresponded to the traditional SARS-CoV-2 PCR used in routine diagnostics. A mean time difference between viability and conventional PCR was estimated, assuming a negative binomial distribution. One hundred two ICU patients were included in the analysis. The time to a negative PCR test result differed significantly between viability PCR and conventional PCR (Paired Prentice-Wilcoxon test IMPORTANCE: This study demonstrated that, within patients, on average, viability PCR became negative 2.4 days earlier than conventional PCR, indicating that viability PCR could potentially assist in de-isolating patients 2.4 days earlier. Future use of this assay could thus aid in improving routine COVID-19 diagnostics and prognostics related to the timing of de-isolation. Additionally, future development of a similar approach for other respiratory viruses could be of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.