Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41347291›Full record

RevieweLife2025

Trained immunity and immune priming in plants and invertebrates.

Joachim Kurtz, Raul Andino, Diana Boraschi, Jorge Contreras-Garduño, Aardra Kachroo, Imroze Khan, Humberto Lanz Mendoza, Krishnendu Mukherjee, Robert Peuß, Jurriaan Ton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Two-StepBiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joachim KurtzInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7258-459X
Raul Andino *Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5503-9349
Diana Boraschi *Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3953-4056
Jorge Contreras-Garduño *Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Morelia, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9231-0641
Aardra Kachroo *Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, United States.
Imroze Khan *Trivedi School of Biosciences, Ashoka University, Sonepat, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8793-5081
Humberto Lanz Mendoza *Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Centro de Investigaciones sobre Enfermedades Infecciosas, Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3083-4797
Krishnendu Mukherjee *Institute of Hygiene, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3470-9117
Robert Peuß *Institute for Integrative Cell Biology and Physiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9716-6650
Jurriaan Ton *School of Biosciences University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8512-2802

Funding

Alliance of International Science Organizations ANSO-CR-KP-2022-01Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation BMGF INV-059115China-Italy Joint Laboratory of Pharmacobiotechnology for Medical Immunomodulation 2024YFE0104500China NSFC-Italy MAECI programme 82261138630DBT-Wellcome Trust Intermediate Fellowship IA/I/20/1/504930European Research Council PlantMemo; 101199639Münster Graduate School of Evolution Evolution Think Tank (ETT) Fellow programUKRI-BBSRC BB/W015250/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune memory has long been thought to be restricted to the adaptive immune system of vertebrates. However, several lines of evidence have changed our understanding of immune memory and have shattered the strict separation between innate and adaptive immunity. In vertebrates, a form of innate immunity that is called 'trained immunity' has been intensively studied for over a decade. For more than two decades, studies in plants and an increasing number of invertebrate taxa have clearly demonstrated that these organisms also possess immune memory, despite the absence of an adaptive immune system. These phenomena are mostly known as 'immune priming'. The mechanistic underpinnings of immune priming vary across taxa and may or may not partially include the epigenetic and metabolic mechanisms involved in trained immunity. Here, we offer an evolutionary perspective on immune priming, uniquely integrating key aspects across plants and invertebrates for the first time. As a basis, we provide a conceptual clarification regarding the terms trained immunity and immune priming and give a brief overview of these phenomena across taxa. We then analyze which processes of immune priming share potentially evolutionary conserved epigenetic and metabolic processes with trained immunity and explore signaling processes involved in immune priming. We discuss the aspect of specificity as one of the key defining criteria for immune memory and incorporate the potential role of soil and gut microbiota for acquiring innate immune memory in plants and invertebrates. Finally, we argue that immune priming has enormous potential for application beyond the medical field when involving the protection against parasites and pathogens in agriculture and aquaculture.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateImmunologic MemoryInvertebratesPlant ImmunityPlantsAnimalsBiological EvolutionEpigenesis, GeneticTrained Immunityevolutionary biologyimmune memoryimmune priminginnate immunityinvertebratesplantstrained immunity

Identifiers

PMID41347291
PMCPMC12680377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.