ArticleNeurophotonics2025
Improving interference control without conflict exposure: prefrontal fNIRS-decoded neurofeedback training.
Article in Neurophotonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An fNIRS Dataset for Cognitive Decoding during a Multi-day Block-design Stroop Task.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Traditional exposure therapy or cognitive training requires repeated presentation of unwanted stimuli, whereas localizationist neuromodulation overlooks individual variation. We propose a closed-loop neuromodulation approach termed functional near-infrared spectroscopy-decoded neurofeedback training, designed to modify prefrontal hemoglobin dynamics and neural activity patterns. Aim: We aim to enhance interference control without interfering stimuli using a data-driven, individualized, time-resolved decoded neurofeedback, potentially offering a balanced compromise and an alternative to traditional approaches. Approach: We employed a randomized, double-blind, between-group design. Both the decoded neurofeedback group (DecNef, Results: There was no significant difference in feedback scores between groups, but the Stroop effect of reaction time (RT) in the DecNef group showed a significant reduction compared with the Sham group, both at post-test ( Conclusions: We proposed a closed-loop neuromodulation approach designed to modify prefrontal neural dynamics, with its core innovation lying in time-resolved individualized decoding. This method can significantly improve cognitive function such as interference control while avoiding exposure to unwanted stimuli and has potential for cognitive enhancement and the treatment of psychological disorders such as phobias and post-traumatic stress disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.