ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Leveraging multimodal learning for enhanced drug-target interaction prediction.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graph-based drug-target interaction modeling: from representation learning to output-driven drug discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Labour-type physical activity, metabolic dysregulation, and hypertension in rural older adults: rethinking work, exercise, and health in a cold-climate agricultural community.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The evolving landscape of artificial intelligence in drug discovery necessitates increasingly sophisticated approaches to predict drug-target interactions (DTIs) with high precision and generalizability. In alignment with the current surge of interest in AI-driven pharmacological modeling and integrative biomedical data analysis, this study introduces a multimodal framework for enhancing DTI prediction by fusing heterogeneous data sources. While conventional methods typically rely on unimodal inputs such as chemical structures or protein sequences, they fall short in capturing the complex, multi-faceted nature of biochemical interactions and are often limited in adaptability across different tasks or incomplete datasets. These limitations impede the model's capability to generalize beyond narrow benchmarks and reduce interpretability when modalities are missing or noisy. Methods: To address these challenges, we propose a comprehensive multimodal learning pipeline composed of three principal innovations. The Unified Multimodal Molecule Encoder (UMME) jointly embeds molecular graphs, textual descriptions, transcriptomics, protein sequences, and bioassay data using modality-specific enc followed by a hierarchical attention-based fusion strategy. This encoder is capable of aligning intra- and inter-modal representations while retaining high-level semantic features critical for interaction prediction. We introduce a robust training strategy named Adaptive Curriculum-guided Modality Optimization (ACMO), which dynamically prioritizes more reliable or informative modalities during early training and gradually incorporates less certain data via a curriculum mechanism. This allows the model to maintain strong performance even when faced with modality absence or noise, thereby mimicking realistic drug screening conditions. We employ a novel cross-modal contrastive alignment loss and modality dropout scheduling, which together enforce consistency and encourage generalization across diverse data settings. Results: Experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance in drug-target affinity estimation and binding prediction tasks, particularly under conditions of partial data availability. Discussion: Ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of both UMME and ACMO components in improving accuracy and robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.