ArticleJournal of international humanitarian action2025
Gender and intimate partner violence considerations for cash transfer programming in South Sudan.
Article in Journal of international humanitarian action, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the use of cash and voucher assistance increases in South Sudan, there is a continued need to understand its potential interactions with gender norms and intimate partner violence. This paper is part of a larger, mixed methods study whose aims were to measure the association between cash transfer program participation and intimate partner violence (IPV) in Gogrial West, South Sudan; to understand how receipt of cash transfers and the way they are delivered may affect gender relations, power dynamics, and IPV in receiving households, and to identify ways to improve design of cash transfers to mitigate IPV risk and enhance positive effects on gender relations. This paper presents results from qualitative research to investigate gender norms and intimate partner violence in the context of cash programming in Gogrial West, South Sudan. Forty-one key informant interviews, 12 focus group discussions, and 30 individual in-depth interviews were conducted over two rounds of data collection between October 2019 and December 2021. The most common gender norms and IPV behaviors included those relating to livelihoods and unmet needs, household decision-making and household stress, family structures, marital disagreements, and perceived acceptability of IPV. Qualitative analysis suggests that the cash transfer program did not particularly disrupt gender dynamics within households, a situation that would heighten risks of intimate partner violence. More participants reported that the cash program decreased intimate partner violence by reducing household stress, but overall evidence on the direct association of this cash program with IPV is limited.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.