Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41347067›Full record

ArticleJournal of international humanitarian action2025

Gender and intimate partner violence considerations for cash transfer programming in South Sudan.

Allison Jeffery, Angelina G Akol, Kate Mieth, Morjan Robert Kenyi Duku, Vanessa Saraiva, Shannon Doocy, Gerbrand Alkema, Kevin Savage, W Courtland Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of international humanitarian action, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Allison JefferyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA.
Angelina G AkolWorld Vision South Sudan, Juba, South Sudan.
Kate MiethJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA.
Morjan Robert Kenyi DukuWorld Vision South Sudan, Juba, South Sudan.
Vanessa SaraivaWorld Vision South Sudan, Juba, South Sudan.
Shannon DoocyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA.
Gerbrand AlkemaWorld Vision United Kingdom, Milton Keynes, UK.
Kevin SavageWorld Vision International, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1541-5060
W Courtland RobinsonJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3068-6168

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the use of cash and voucher assistance increases in South Sudan, there is a continued need to understand its potential interactions with gender norms and intimate partner violence. This paper is part of a larger, mixed methods study whose aims were to measure the association between cash transfer program participation and intimate partner violence (IPV) in Gogrial West, South Sudan; to understand how receipt of cash transfers and the way they are delivered may affect gender relations, power dynamics, and IPV in receiving households, and to identify ways to improve design of cash transfers to mitigate IPV risk and enhance positive effects on gender relations. This paper presents results from qualitative research to investigate gender norms and intimate partner violence in the context of cash programming in Gogrial West, South Sudan. Forty-one key informant interviews, 12 focus group discussions, and 30 individual in-depth interviews were conducted over two rounds of data collection between October 2019 and December 2021. The most common gender norms and IPV behaviors included those relating to livelihoods and unmet needs, household decision-making and household stress, family structures, marital disagreements, and perceived acceptability of IPV. Qualitative analysis suggests that the cash transfer program did not particularly disrupt gender dynamics within households, a situation that would heighten risks of intimate partner violence. More participants reported that the cash program decreased intimate partner violence by reducing household stress, but overall evidence on the direct association of this cash program with IPV is limited.

Identifiers

PMID41347067
PMCPMC12672747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.