ArticleHealth information science and systems2026
Construction of performance score dynamic prediction system for clinical departments using explainable machine learning.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate evaluation of clinical departmental performance is essential for public hospital management. However, existing approaches primarily rely on static, retrospective annual assessments and lack interpretability, limiting their ability to support early intervention and informed decision-making. To address these gaps, the study aimed to present a dynamic framework for predicting annual departmental performance score based on real-world hospital data using explainable machine learning. Methods: Performance data between January 2023 to December 2024 was collected from the Hospital Information System (HIS). Six machine learning models, namely Linear Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, CatBoost, were trained to predict annual performance scores across three cumulative time windows (January-March, January-June, January-September) with traning set of 2023 and testing set of 2024. Model Evaluation was using metrics such as R Results: A total of 648 records covering 24 months was obtained from 27 clinical departments. Compared with among models, LR model achieved the highest R Conclusion: The study presented a novel dynamic framework for clinical departmental performance prediction in tertiary public hospital using explainable machine learning. The framework supports progressive performance monitoring across multiple time windows and provides timely insights to inform managerial decisions. In addition, the development of the web tool helps facilitate practical application, offering methodological support and practical reference for performance management in public healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.