ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Comparative analysis of optimized logistic regression with state-of-the-art models for complex gastroenterological image analysis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparative study of quantum-inspired PSO and EA with their binary variants for heart disease classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Classifying gastrointestinal (GI) polyps detected in colonoscopy images is a critical task in colorectal cancer prevention. Given the diagnostic ambiguity of serrated polyps, which share morphological features with both hyperplastic and adenomatous lesions, this study focuses on multiclass classification using machine learning (ML) techniques. Multiclass Logistic Regression (LR), a model favored by clinicians for its interpretability, was initially optimized and evaluated. Methods: A structured dataset comprising 152 instances and 698 extracted features was used. We conducted a statistical analysis of 88 LR configurations, varying solvers, penalties, and regularization strengths. To improve classification performance, four additional ML algorithms were implemented: k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost. For each classifier, parameter tuning was applied using grid search and stratified cross-validation. Results: The best-performing LR model (liblinear solver, L1 penalty, Discussion: While LR remains valuable for its interpretability, ensemble methods such as XGBoost and Random Forest demonstrated superior performance and robustness. These findings support the integration of advanced ML models into clinical decision support systems, particularly in low-data scenarios where deep learning may be impractical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.