Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346992›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Comparative analysis of optimized logistic regression with state-of-the-art models for complex gastroenterological image analysis.

Daniela-Maria Cristea, Ioan Sima, Laszlo Barna Iantovics

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniela-Maria CristeaUniversity '1 Decembrie 1918' of Alba Iulia, Alba Iulia, Romania.
Ioan SimaDoctoral School in Mathematics and Computer Science, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Laszlo Barna IantovicsElectrical Engineering and Information Technology Department, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Targu Mures, Târgu Mureş, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Classifying gastrointestinal (GI) polyps detected in colonoscopy images is a critical task in colorectal cancer prevention. Given the diagnostic ambiguity of serrated polyps, which share morphological features with both hyperplastic and adenomatous lesions, this study focuses on multiclass classification using machine learning (ML) techniques. Multiclass Logistic Regression (LR), a model favored by clinicians for its interpretability, was initially optimized and evaluated. Methods: A structured dataset comprising 152 instances and 698 extracted features was used. We conducted a statistical analysis of 88 LR configurations, varying solvers, penalties, and regularization strengths. To improve classification performance, four additional ML algorithms were implemented: k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost. For each classifier, parameter tuning was applied using grid search and stratified cross-validation. Results: The best-performing LR model (liblinear solver, L1 penalty, Discussion: While LR remains valuable for its interpretability, ensemble methods such as XGBoost and Random Forest demonstrated superior performance and robustness. These findings support the integration of advanced ML models into clinical decision support systems, particularly in low-data scenarios where deep learning may be impractical.

Indexed as

colorectal diseasegastrointestinal polypsk-nearest neighborslogistic regression algorithmmachine learningmultinomial classifierrandom forestsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID41346992
PMCPMC12672889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.