Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346987›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Risk factors for failed extubation within 7 days in elderly critically ill patients based on respiratory mechanics and clinical indicators: a retrospective cohort study.

Xixi Ruan, Xiaping Zhang, Weihang Hu, Liang Wu, Yikuan Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xixi Ruan *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaping Zhang *Department of Acupuncture, Xinchang Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Xinchang, China.
Weihang HuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Liang WuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Yikuan ShenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are common treatments for critically ill patients. Extubation failure is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, increased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and elevated mortality. Elderly patients face unique challenges. Thus, early risk assessment for weaning and extubation in elderly patients is crucial. This study aimed to identify independent risk factors for extubation failure within 7 days in elderly critically ill patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 103 elderly patients with tracheal intubation admitted to our ICU from January 2022 to July 2025. Clinical characteristics of patients with extubation failure within 7 days were analyzed. The optimal cutoff values for continuous variables were determined using the Youden index. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for extubation failure within 7 days. Results: There was a high rate of extubation failure within 7 days in elderly critically ill patients. Logistic regression showed that female (OR = 6.770, 95% CI 1.100-41.654, Conclusion: Female, serum sodium >145.76 mmol/L, lactate >3.45 mmol/L at intubation, and Ppeak >18.5 cmH₂O at relative stability after intubation are independent risk factors for extubation failure within 7 days in elderly patients with tracheal intubation.

Indexed as

elderly critical illnessextubation failurerespiratory mechanicsrisk factortracheal extubation

Identifiers

PMID41346987
PMCPMC12672513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.