Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346944›Full record

ArticleCardiology and cardiovascular medicine2025

Pulse Oximetry Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Defects: Effectiveness and Implementation across Clinical Settings.

Gauri Gurumurthy, Devendra K Agrawal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Should Dual Pulse Oximetry Screening Be Used in Neonates? The Insights from the CHOOSE Study.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gauri GurumurthyDepartment of Translational Research, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific.
Devendra K AgrawalWestern University of Health Sciences, Pomona, California 91766 USA.

Funding

Research Education Program to Promote Diversity in Immunologic and Allergic DiseasesR25AI179582 · NIAID · WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Devendra K. Agrawal · 2025 to 2026
$756k
NIAID NIH HHS R25 AI179582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital heart defects are the most prevalent congenital anomalies, occurring in approximately 1% of live births and accounting for nearly one-third of all major congenital disorders worldwide. Within this spectrum, critical congenital heart defects (CCHDs) represent the most severe forms, often necessitating surgical or catheter-based intervention within the first year of life. Delayed or missed diagnosis of CCHDs remains a major cause of preventable neonatal morbidity and mortality, underscoring the importance of timely detection. Pulse oximetry screening has emerged as a noninvasive, inexpensive, and highly specific method to identify hypoxemia, particularly in duct-dependent lesions that may otherwise escape early clinical recognition. Since its universal adoption in the United States in 2011, pulse oximetry screening has consistently demonstrated value as a complementary tool to prenatal ultrasound and physical examination, improving detection rates, reducing emergency hospitalizations, and lowering infant mortality. Despite its proven clinical impact, important challenges remain. Screening sensitivity is limited, especially for conditions such as coarctation of the aorta that may not produce early hypoxemia. Variability in protocols, including timing of screening, pre- versus post-ductal measurement, and thresholds for repeat testing, contributes to inconsistent performance across hospitals. Moreover, recent evidence of racial bias in pulse oximetry accuracy, along with persistent disparities in early detection across demographic groups, highlights the need for inclusive device validation and standardized protocols. In low- and middle-income countries, pilot studies from Rwanda, Nigeria, and India demonstrate feasibility and dual benefits for detecting both cardiac and non-cardiac hypoxemic conditions, but widespread implementation is hindered by resource constraints, inadequate referral pathways, and limited access to confirmatory echocardiography. Emerging strategies, including integration with electronic medical records, computerized clinical decision support systems, and mobile health technologies, hold promise for standardizing workflows, improving compliance, and extending reach to resource-limited settings. This article presents a synthesisis of current evidence on the effectiveness, limitations, and global implementation of pulse oximetry screening for the detection of congenital heart defect detection, highlighting both its established role in neonatal care and the urgent need for innovations to address disparities, optimize protocols, and ensure equitable access to screening worldwide.

Indexed as

Atrial septal defectClinical settingsCongenital heart defectCritical congenital heart defectEfficacyImplementationPatent ductus arteriosusPulse oximetry screeningTetralogy of Fallot

Identifiers

PMID41346944
PMCPMC12674206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.