Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346941›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Short videos platforms as sources of health information about cervical cancer screening: A content and quality analysis.

Luyang Su, Jingrun Yao, Xiaohang Ai, Ren Xu, Yanan Ren, Cuiqiao Meng, Pei Wang, Qi Wu, Zeqing Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comment on "Analysis of Quality, Reliability, and Content of Cervical Cancer-Related Chinese Videos on TikTok".Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luyang SuPhysical Examination Center, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Jingrun YaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fourth Hospital Of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Xiaohang AiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fourth Hospital Of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Ren XuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yanan RenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Cuiqiao MengPhysical Examination Center, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Pei WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Qi WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Zeqing DuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1267-8438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is a significant global health concern with over 662,000 new cases and approximately 349,000 deaths in 2022. Despite the clear benefits of screening, a portion of the population remains unaware of its importance. In China, short video platforms such as Kuaishou, Bilibili, and TikTok host numerous related videos, but the quality varies significantly. Method: Using the keyword "cervical cancer screening," the top 100 videos on each platform were searched (totaling 300), with 259 meeting the criteria. A comparative analysis was conducted on video duration, engagement metrics (likes, favorites, comments, shares), follower count, uploader identity, and video type. The Global Quality Score (GQS) and modified DISCERN tool were used for evaluation. Results: The study included 82 Kuaishou videos, 93 Bilibili videos, and 84 TikTok videos. Bilibili had the longest median video duration (109 s), while Kuaishou had the shortest (54.5 s). Kuaishou outperformed TikTok and Bilibili in engagement metrics. TikTok had a higher proportion of videos on the importance, process, considerations, and timing of screening. Professional uploaders (obstetricians and gynecologists whose expertise directly pertains to cervical cancer screening) were most prevalent on TikTok (74%). TikTok videos had the highest quality scores in GQS and mDISCERN, followed by Bilibili and Kuaishou. Significant differences in mDISCERN scores were found among the platforms (all pairwise comparisons Conclusion: Social media platforms provide accessible health information, but the quality and reliability of cervical cancer screening videos vary significantly. Professionally uploaded videos generally have higher engagement and information reliability. Content creators should prioritize high-quality, accurate videos, and platforms should enhance content quality control to prevent misinformation dissemination.

Indexed as

BilibiliCervical cancer screeninginformation qualityKuaishoushort videos platformsTikTok

Identifiers

PMID41346941
PMCPMC12673052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.