ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Sustainability in Aesthetic and Surgical Clinics: Impacts and Practical Interventions.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study explored practical strategies to reduce the environmental impact of aesthetic and surgical clinics. It provided an overview of key areas where aesthetic medicine contributes to waste, carbon emissions, and other environmental challenges. By examining life-cycle assessments and current practices, the study provided recommendations for clinics to adopt sustainable approaches while maintaining high standards of patient care. Methods: A structured review was conducted using PubMed to identify literature on sustainability and life-cycle assessment in aesthetic dermatology, plastic surgery, and cosmetics. The search covered publications from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2023. Of 48 initially identified studies, 26 were included after manual screening. Data on environmental impact, waste, emissions, and cost savings were extracted. Results: Several clinic operations contribute significantly to environmental impact, including energy use, transportation, personal protective equipment, surgical supplies, and waste management. Retrofitting with light-emitting diode bulbs could save 2179 kg of CO Conclusions: Aesthetic and surgical medicine has a substantial environmental footprint. Implementing strategies such as energy-efficient upgrades, reusable materials, and eco-friendly transportation can reduce impact while preserving care quality. These changes support broader sustainability goals and improve clinic efficiency.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.