ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Penile Volume Augmentation With Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Ultrasound Observation.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile volumization using hyaluronic acid fillers has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative for men seeking aesthetic enhancement of penile girth. Hyaluronic acid fillers have emerged as a nonsurgical option for penile girth enhancement, with studies reporting favorable safety profiles. This case report details the treatment of a 35-year-old man, outlining procedural steps, patient outcomes, and safety considerations. The patient had normal endocrine function with no history of endocrine disorders. A supplementary video documenting the injection technique has been included. Ultrasound image guidance was used to confirm accurate placement of the filler (e.p.t.q.® Lidocaine S 300, JETEMA Co., Ltd. Korea) within the intended anatomical plane, between the dartos fascia and Buck fascia. Outcomes demonstrated a significant increase in penile circumference, from 12.3 to 13.0 cm, with high patient satisfaction and no major complications. This report described a technical approach using ultrasound guidance and anatomical considerations in a single patient; further research is necessary to evaluate outcomes in a larger cohort.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.