ArticleCureus2025
Effect of Different Female Factors on Pregnancy Rates in Artificial Insemination With Donor Sperm Cycles: A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Pregnancy Outcome Prediction Models Between AIH and AID Patients.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Artificial insemination with donor sperm (AID) is an established treatment option for various indications. The outcome of such treatment is likely to be affected by different female factors and associated factors contributing to infertility. Existing evidence lacks clarity in this regard. This study aimed to assess the effect of different female factors on pregnancy rates in donor insemination cycles. This prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital from March 2023 to December 2024. Methods One hundred and two patients undergoing AID cycles were included in the study. Various female characteristics were compared for pregnancy outcomes. Data entered in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA) and analysed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 27.0; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY). Statistical association was tested using the chi-square test. A p-value < 0.05 was statistically significant. Results Out of 102 females undergoing AID cycles, 15 had a clinical pregnancy (14.7%). Ongoing pregnancy rate was 11.8%. The duration of infertility was significantly less in patients having successful clinical and ongoing pregnancies (p<0.05). Female age, body mass index (BMI), number of AID cycles, type of infertility, and additional female factors affecting fertility were similar in patients with or without successful pregnancies. Conclusion Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates after AID cycles are affected by the duration of infertility. The presence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and endometriosis in female partners is less likely to alter the AID cycle outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.