Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346898›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Improving Colorectal Screening Compliance Through Targeted Quality Improvement Interventions in Primary Care.

Olubunmi Oladunjoye, Isabel Valdez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olubunmi OladunjoyeSection of General Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Isabel ValdezSection of General Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the United States, and yet it is one of the most preventable cancers. Despite multiple available screening options, national CRC screening rates remain suboptimal. There is an observed

objectiveIncrease CRC screening rates by 10% among patients aged 45-64 years old in a primary care clinic between July 2023 and May 2024.

methodsA multimodal intervention approach that utilized (1) educational presentations for faculty and nursing staff on processes, indications, risks, and benefits of both invasive and non-invasive CRC screening methods; (2) development and dissemination of educational patient brochures for patients in the clinic; and (3) delivery of electronic patient portal messages containing education on risks of colon cancer and screening modalities to all 2,020 patients who were overdue for CRC screening or had never completed screening. Subsequent automated reminders were also sent on days 15, 30, and 45. The main measure was the monthly CRC screening rate among patients aged 45-64 years old.

resultsCRC screening rates increased from 65.5 to 74.3% over a 12-month period. A more consistent upward trend was seen after Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle 3, which incorporated patient portal messaging and automated reminders.

conclusionImplementation of multimodal interventions that include clinician training, patient education, and targeted patient outreach can bring about a positive impact on CRC screening rates. While temporal association suggests these interventions may have contributed to improvements, more rigorous study designs are needed to establish causation.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerimprovementoutcomesqualityscreening

Identifiers

PMID41346898
PMCPMC12674911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.