ArticleCureus2025
Evaluating the Quality of Patient Handoff Communication in the Department of Medicine at Dongola Specialized Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Communication failure at the point of handoff is one of the most significant preventable medical errors, especially in resource-scarce settings. Worldwide, the use of the I-PASS (Illness severity, Patient summary, Action list, Situation awareness and contingency planning, and Synthesis by receiver) tool has been shown to improve the accuracy and consistency of handovers of patients. The quality improvement audit was to assess and optimize patient handoff through the structured utilization of the I-PASS tool for Dongola Specialized Hospital in Sudan. Methods A prospective three-cycle audit, the Department of Medicine of Dongola Specialized Hospital was subjected to three rounds of quality improvement audit between 2 November 2023 and 11 September 2025. All clinical handoffs by medical officers, registrars, and house officers were observed. Standards for the audit were derived from the I-PASS system, covering illness severity, patient summary, action list, situational awareness, and synthesis by receiver. Compliance was recorded through structured observation checklists, and focused intervention included role-plays, training workshops, and standard checklists. Chi-square testing was used for statistical analysis. Results Cycle 1 (n = 37) demonstrated poor baseline compliance: illness severity (21.6%), summary statements (10.8%), and continuous assessment (8.1%). Meaningful improvements were observed at Cycle 2 (n = 74), such as illness severity (68.9%) and summary statements (93.2%), although timeline/ownership (41.9%) and receiver synthesis (2.7%) declined. In Cycle 3 (n = 86), continued and comprehensive improvements were achieved: illness severity (96.5%), summary statements (100%), continuous assessment (98.8%), and plan documentation (95.3%). Receiver synthesis improved to 88.4%, question-asking to 80.2%, and ownership to 100%. Chi-square analysis confirmed statistically significant improvements in all parameters (p < 0.0001). Conclusion Orderly implementation of the I-PASS communication framework significantly increased the safety, thoroughness, and precision of Dongola Specialized Hospital's patient transitions. Incremental improvements noted over three rounds reiterated the value of educational activities, follow-up audits, and institutional support for institutionalizing structured communication methodologies. Extension of the I-PASS model to additional departments and medical facilities in Sudan can potentially improve patient safety in a precarious healthcare environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.