Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346869›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Semantic Typicality of Affixes Facilitates Word Processing: MEG Evidence From Arabic.

Marianne Azar, Alec Marantz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marianne AzarDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8037-0365
Alec MarantzDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4805-2910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upon reading a word, we decompose it into meaningful parts-morphemes. Even if novel, we can derive a likely meaning for it based on how its parts typically behave. Given the typical meaning of affix "-ery," we may guess that a bottlery is a place to make bottles, although we may alternatively guess that it is the craft of bottle making. In this study, we operationalize this feature-an affix's semantic typicality-to investigate affix semantics' role in word processing. Using a lexical decision task and a double dissociative design in an MEG setting, we took advantage of Arabic's highly productive word-pattern derivational system to investigate the role of meaning typicality for derivational morphology. We contrasted one affix typically denoting tools and atypically places with another affix having the reverse denotation pattern. We found higher activity for typical-meaning words in the temporal pole, inferior temporal gyrus, and middle temporal gyrus at an earlier time window than previously associated with semantic processing. Additionally, we replicated results on noun/verb ambiguity, where ambiguous words had higher activity in the fusiform gyrus and throughout the temporal lobe. Our results on lexicality-contrasting words versus nonwords-were also consistent with previous literature. A finer-grained distinction between pseudowords with real roots versus pseudoroots further allowed us to explore the role of affixes in processing in the temporal pole and the inferior frontal cortex. Overall, our study contributes importantly to findings on affix semantic processing and contributes generally to growing findings on different stages of morphological decomposition.

Indexed as

affixesArabicMEGmorphologysemantics

Identifiers

PMID41346869
PMCPMC12674548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.