ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2025
Human Motion Detection in Swimming Motion Video Based on Multiscale Separation Spatio-Temporal Attention Mechanism.
Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Human Motion Detection in Swimming Motion Video Based on Multiscale Separation Spatio-Temporal Attention Mechanism.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Swimming motion video human motion detection is becoming increasingly important in sports training and event analysis. Existing methods are deficient in dealing with complex underwater environments and rapid changes in swimming movements, and the accuracy and real-time performance of motion detection are low. Therefore, the study proposes a human motion detection method for swimming motion video based on multiscale (MS) separation spatio-temporal attention mechanism (STAM). The encoder-decoder architecture extracts and fuses features of different scales in both spatial and temporal dimensions to realize automatic detection and precise localization of swimming motion. The experimental results indicated that the feature extraction accuracy reached 97.34% after 43 iterations, and the feature importance reached 0.982 after 40 iterations. In terms of recognition accuracy, the average accuracy of the model reached 94.02%, the recall rate was 93.09%, and the F1 score was 93.56%. Adaptive testing of movement changes showed that the detection accuracy generally remained above 89%, and the accuracy in slow and large-sized movements even exceeded 95%. In addition to increasing swimming action detection's precision and resilience, the work offers technological and theoretical backing for the creation of intelligent sports analysis systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.