Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346857›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

The application progress of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis diagnosis.

Wenwei Zhang, Dongxu Tai, Siwen Kang, Keda Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenwei ZhangLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Dongxu TaiLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Shenyang, China.
Siwen KangLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Shenyang, China.
Keda LiLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis (OP) is a systemic bone metabolic disorder characterized by a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) and damage to the trabecular bone microarchitecture. With the increasing global aging population, the incidence of OP has been rising annually, particularly among elderly women, making it a significant public health issue. Traditional diagnostic methods such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), quantitative computed tomography (QCT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are effective, but they also have certain limitations. Artificial intelligence (AI) technology is playing an increasingly important role in the management of osteoporosis. Through machine learning (ML), image processing, and data analysis, AI can accurately assess bone density, fracture risk, and other factors, improving the early diagnosis rate of OP and providing strong decision support for clinicians to optimize treatment plans and enhance treatment outcomes. However, it also faces challenges such as AI model interpretability, insufficient diversity in training data, lack of clinical validation, and issues related to privacy protection and ethics. Addressing these problems is crucial for promoting the widespread application of AI technology in this field. As technology continues to advance, AI will become an indispensable part of OP research and clinical applications, driving the development of personalized treatment and precision medicine.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencediagnosisfracture riskmachine learningosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID41346857
PMCPMC12672449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.