ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
The application progress of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis diagnosis.
Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in osteoporosis screening and fracture risk prediction among aging populations: a bibliometric evidence map.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- AI-enhanced routine CT for opportunistic osteoporosis screening and risk assessment.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- Application of machine learning in osteoporosis screening: a narrative review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Risk Prediction and Therapy: Current Advances, Clinical Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis (OP) is a systemic bone metabolic disorder characterized by a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) and damage to the trabecular bone microarchitecture. With the increasing global aging population, the incidence of OP has been rising annually, particularly among elderly women, making it a significant public health issue. Traditional diagnostic methods such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), quantitative computed tomography (QCT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are effective, but they also have certain limitations. Artificial intelligence (AI) technology is playing an increasingly important role in the management of osteoporosis. Through machine learning (ML), image processing, and data analysis, AI can accurately assess bone density, fracture risk, and other factors, improving the early diagnosis rate of OP and providing strong decision support for clinicians to optimize treatment plans and enhance treatment outcomes. However, it also faces challenges such as AI model interpretability, insufficient diversity in training data, lack of clinical validation, and issues related to privacy protection and ethics. Addressing these problems is crucial for promoting the widespread application of AI technology in this field. As technology continues to advance, AI will become an indispensable part of OP research and clinical applications, driving the development of personalized treatment and precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.