ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025
Diverse climbing strategies in aroid vines: functional adaptations and environmental drivers.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aroid vines are an essential group for vertical space resource utilization in tropical rainforests and serve as key materials for vertical greening in urban landscapes and home gardening. Understanding their climbing strategies is crucial for rainforest ecological conservation and alleviating urban green space shortages. However, current research on the climbing growth of aroid vines remains fragmented. This article systematically reviews the existing literature, synthesizing advances in three key research domains: functional climbing-type classification and global distribution of climbing aroids, climbing strategies, and influencing factors. The review explores the climbing strategies and morphological plasticity from the perspectives of roots, stems, and leaves. Additionally, factors such as light conditions, host surfaces characteristics, mechanical contact, and growth direction are analyzed to understand the growth traits and environmental adaptability of aroid vines. The review highlights that: (1) Aroid vines can be classified by life form into terrestrial vines, epiphytic vines, and semi-epiphytic vines, and by the degree of leaf differentiation into isomorphic, allomorphic, and heteromorphic vines. However, their current life-form classification systems remain to be refined; (2) Root adhesion serves as the core climbing strategy, characterized by the dimorphism of aerial roots, which facilitate attachment through clasping roots; (3) Aroid vines exhibit pronounced morphological plasticity to cope with environmental transitions from the terrestrial to the canopy, reallocating resources toward aboveground organs-enhancing water and nutrient transport through the proliferation of feeder roots, stem thickening, and hydraulic optimization, while promoting photosynthetic efficiency and drought tolerance via heterophyllous leaf development; (4) Negative phototropism drives the search for supports, light intensity regulates leaf morphological development, and host surface roughness and material significantly affect attachment efficiency and biomass allocation. Mechanical contact and gravity direction influence growth through hormone homeostasis, coordinating resource distribution. Based on current findings, future research directions and actionable recommendations are proposed to provide a theoretical foundation for the further exploitation and utilization of aroid vines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.