Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346815›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied phycology2025

Optimizing nursery conditions of the commercial kelp

Reina J Veenhof, Rob Grisenthwaite, Alison Mair, Elaine Mitchell, Michele S Stanley, Puja Kumari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied phycology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reina J VeenhofUniversity of the Highlands and Islands, UHI House, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH UK.
Rob GrisenthwaiteScottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Argyll PA37 1QA UK.
Alison MairScottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Argyll PA37 1QA UK.
Elaine MitchellScottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Argyll PA37 1QA UK.
Michele S StanleyUniversity of the Highlands and Islands, UHI House, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH UK.
Puja KumariUniversity of the Highlands and Islands, UHI House, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A global rise in kelp aquaculture has resulted in an increased demand for high quality and quantity kelp seedstock, yet many bottlenecks remain to sustainable scale-up solutions. One such bottleneck is increasing biomass quickly and efficiently in the nursery phase of the kelp cultivation cycle. The microscopic gametophyte is leveraged during this phase, using red light to stimulate vegetative growth and delay onset of gametophyte fertility until deployment. However, red light may make the gametophyte less photosynthetically efficient and thus slow growth. A solution may be growing gametophytes in blue light, which can increase production, while changing the nutrient composition of the media to repress fertility. Here we test the efficacy of light source (blue and red), two common media types (PES and f/2) and iron supplementation on the growth, fertility and photosynthetic parameters of Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10811-025-03665-z.

Indexed as

Bulk cultivationGametogenesisPhaeophyceaePhotosynthesisReproductionSeaweed aquacultureSeeding

Identifiers

PMID41346815
PMCPMC12672681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.