ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Information quality assessment and content analysis of dementia prevention on WeChat: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the information quality and content of dementia prevention on WeChat. Methods: The search term "dementia prevention" was used on WeChat, resulting in 125 samples being included. Information quality was assessed using GQS and PEMAT-P. The content was evaluated based on dementia prevention guidelines and article characteristics. Results: Information quality was moderate (median 3.0), with high understandability and actionability. Most articles were published by medical institutions (37.6%), but governmental organizations achieved the highest scores ( Conclusion: Overall, the information quality of dementia prevention on WeChat was medium, with high understandability and actionability but low content completeness. Articles with more complete content and fewer advertisements have better information quality. It is recommended that publishers provide more complete articles, while platforms should strengthen advertisement supervision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.